The other day I talked to Karamoon about making an English teacher’s collective loosely based on a Barcamp-esque model. Recently with the economic downturn, the pros seem to be outweighed by the cons of working as an employee for Englsh teaching companies.
The reoccurring problems I have encountered as being an employee for English teaching companies in Japan include but are not limited to the following points:
1) You are an employee.
In most English teaching companies, managerial decisions are made by sales people and managers who actually have no experience of English teaching. Rules and regulations tend to be arbitrary, unhelpful, demoralizing and petty.
2) Crappy teaching materials.
Companies understandably want to cut costs by not investing in materials development. Most companies get by with really bad textbooks pushed on them by publishing companies from Europe which don’t understand the Japanese market. Students don’t seem to mind but it can be demoralizing as an English teacher.
3) Pay
Since English teaching agencies have infested the market, the number of people taking a cut increases and pay levels decrease.
4) Pandering to the student
If there is a problem with a student, many English teaching companies will automatically side with the student no matter how mentally disturbed they are. It is assumed that the teacher is wrong.
At this point you may be thinking, “this guy is just some stupid, bitter, burned out, lazy English teacher with an axe to grind”. And you’d be right. I am. But admitting it is half the battle.
It would also be unfair to not mention the obvious point that English teaching companies can usually provide a stable and steady income of which I have benefited from in the past.
However, this is not the case now with the financial meltdown as we have seen that corporations were never your friends, especially now.
So what’s next?
This is only experiment but I was thinking of organizing a teacher’s collective. You’d start small with about five teachers who promise to meet regularly, find private students, teach and cover other lessons. Students would study directly with the teacher so the middle man would be cut out reducing costs.Teachers would be responsible for providing good quality material which could be shared and even put into a database.
It would be organized as a collective with no one person with a controlling stake as such. There would have to be some kind of Barcamp-esque mission statement, purpose or constitution to focus and push the group forward. It should also help to avoid the problems I mentioned above.
Would this work? Is this just some airey fairy communist like manefesto that is doomed to faliure? Just how lazy and unmotivated are we? I don’t know, however I do feel obliged to attempt to provide a positive alternative when bitching and complaining about something. Plus, I would like to say I at least tried not to be bitter, lazy and stupid.